The Research Basis for the Hooked on Phonics® Learn to Read Pre-K Levels
The Hooked on Phonics® Learn to Read program uses systematic instruction and multisensory materials to help children learn to read. The instructional approach and techniques are based on current research about how children learn to read, and the levels build systematically from letters and sounds, then to words and sentences, and ultimately to reading fluency.
The Hooked on Phonics Learn to Read Pre-K levels comprise the first two levels of a research-based, eight-level program. The Pre-K levels are designed to help build phonemic awareness and teach beginning reading skills. They were developed in response to the increasingly documented principle that children who have a basic understanding of letters and letter sounds before kindergarten become more successful readers. They are designed to help parents work collaboratively with their preschool-aged children to prepare them to learn to read. Using the learn-practice-play approach common to all Hooked on Phonics programs, Hooked on Phonics Learn to Read Pre-K levels help children build phonemic awareness, learn letter recognition, and understand the association of letters with their letter sounds.
Reading Readiness before School
Myriad studies and sources demonstrate that children who are in a reading-readiness stage when they begin school are more likely to become successful readers.
Organizations lauding reading readiness include the U.S. Department of Education, which asserts that children ages three to four should be able to identify some letters and make some letter-sound matches, understand that print carries a message, identify familiar signs and labels, and make some attempts to read. Additionally, the National Governors Association released a report that highlights the importance of ensuring that every child enter school prepared to learn to read. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development’s Partnership for Reading notes, “Children who go to kindergarten already knowing the shapes and names of the letters of the alphabet, and how to write them, have an easier time learning to read.”
A large body of research supports reading readiness. An early study by Beck and Juel reported the overriding importance of children acquiring prerequisite reading skills early on. Perhaps more important, researchers also report that these early skills predict later reading comprehension, and that conversely, children who start learning to read later seldom become skillful readers.
Application: The Hooked on Phonics Learn to Read Pre-K levels recognize that literacy is a learned skill and that coherent, skill-based instruction must begin in the years before the child enters kindergarten. To help children build phonemic awareness and reach reading readiness, they provide step-by-step instructions for parents and engaging multisensory materials, such as workbooks, flash cards, online interactive games, and DVDs to help parents prepare their children to learn to read.
Parents as Teachers
Parents are their children’s first teachers. In general, children who receive good instruction and parenting at home are more likely to become good readers. The U.S. Department of Education notes, “Students’ exposure to various reading materials at home and family support for students’ school and literacy efforts can play a critical role in students’ growth as readers, and also says, “Without doubt, reading with children spells success for early literacy.” The American Academy of Pediatrics strongly recommends daily reading to children from six months of age. The National Association for the Education of Young Children, the International Reading Association, and the National Commission on Reading concur that the single most important activity for developing literacy skills in young children is reading aloud to them. Clearly, parental involvement is critical for a child to achieve reading readiness before entering school.
Application: The Hooked on Phonics Learn to ReadPre-K levels are designed to lead parents step by step so they can guide their children through all the activities and lessons. It provides easy-to-use instructions on every page of the workbooks, a tutorial video on the DVDs, and a quick-start guide for quick reference. Each unit in the Learn to Read Pre-K levels ends with a storybook for parents to read to their children.
Phonemic awareness refers to the ability to focus on and manipulate phonemes in spoken words. Phonemes are the smallest units of sound constituting spoken language. As children build phonemic awareness, they recognize that words like cat and bat rhyme, and that cow and kite share the same beginning sound. The notion that phonemic awareness is integral to reading readiness and future reading success is prevalent throughout various research studies. A study by Fielding-Barnsley states, “Despite the differing teaching methodologies, the researchers agree on the importance of phonemic awareness and alphabet knowledge in early reading instruction.” Studies have also shown that the most accurate predictor of early reading capability, even prior to actual reading acquisition, is a child’s understanding of how words are made up of sounds. When children learn to discern the different sounds that make up words, they exhibit more competence in reading, word recognition, and spelling.
The National Reading Panel study Teaching Children to Read found that “teaching phonemic awareness to children significantly improves their reading more than instruction that lacks any attention to [phonemic awareness]. . . . This training was the cause of improvement in students’ phonemic awareness, reading, and spelling following training.”
Application: The Hooked on Phonics Learn to ReadPre-K levels were developed on the basis of scientific reading research that supports phonemic awareness. The principles of phonemic awareness are woven throughout these first two levels of the Learn to Read program.
The Alphabetic Principle
The International Reading Association defines the alphabetic principle as the form of instruction that teaches children about letters, letter patterns, and how these patterns correspond to spoken words. Research shows that children learning to read need early and extensive practice working with these sound-spelling patterns.
As suggested by experts, after acquiring phonemic awareness, children appear to acquire alphabetic knowledge in a sequence that begins with letter names, then letter shapes, and finally letter sounds. Studies indicate that both letter recognition and knowledge of letter sounds are necessary for reading readiness and that children who are instructed in letter-sound correspondence outperform children who have not had this instruction.
Application: The Hooked on Phonics Learn to ReadPre-K levels were developed on the basis of scientific reading research that supports oral language, alphabetic knowledge, and print awareness. This principle of the name-shape-sound sequence for alphabet acquisition is evident in the Pre-K levels, which systematically teach the basics of uppercase and lowercase letter recognition and letter sounds.
Young children learn through hands-on, meaningful experiences, and they must practice what they’ve learned. The findings of one research paper by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development stresses, “Children need extensive practice applying their knowledge of sound-spelling relationships to the task of reading as they are learning them.” They must practice the letters and words they learn to gain automatic recognition and a foundational knowledge of spelling-sound correspondences.
Children also learn from word play and games. Researcher Delores Dickerson asserts that children stay on task longer when having fun and found in one study a 30 to 53 percent greater level of learning effectiveness when using a game rather than a worksheet to teach. She concluded that the game format not only encouraged children and provided instant feedback, but also reinforced the lesson.
Application:The learn-practice-play approach is used throughout the Hooked on Phonics Learn to Read Pre-K levels. Learn: Each workbook activity teaches children the letter names, shapes, and sounds, and each unit starts with a phonemic awareness-building activity. Practice: The workbook review pages, flash card games, and online interactive games reinforce these skills. Play: Each unit ends with a storybook that was specially written to support what children have just learned. Play is extended in the funfilled DVDs, which contain hours of songs, rhymes, and animation that reinforce and help build phonemic awareness.
This paper includes a sample of the research on which the Learn to Read Pre-K levels are based. These were developed in light of current research showing that children need phonemic awareness before learning to read, and that students who achieved reading readiness before entering school have greater success as readers. The learn-practice-play approach provides bite-sized skills children can master in one session, progresses cumulatively, and ensures success and measurable progress with each session. The Learn to Read Pre-K levels provide parents with enjoyable, high-interest activities and stories to practice and reinforce reading readiness skills with their children in an engaging way. The Learn to Read Pre-K levels incorporate phonemic awareness, the alphabetic principle and the use of parents as teachers- all proven approaches for helping children achieve reading readiness and set the stage for becoming successful readers.
Anderson, R., E. Hiebert, J. Scott, and I. Wilkinson. 1985. Becoming a Nation of Readers. Champaign, IL: Center for the Study of Reading.
Armbruster, B. B., F. Lehr, and J. Osborn. 2003. Proven Ideas from Research for Parents: A Child Becomes a Reader; Birth through Preschool. Portsmouth, NH: The Partnership for Reading, National Institute for Literacy, Produced by RMC Research Corporation. www.nifl.gov/partnershipforreading/publications/html/parent_guides/birth_to_pre.html.
2000. Put Reading First: The Research Building Blocks for Teaching Children to Read. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy. Asher, J. 1988. Brainswitching: A Skill for the 21st Century. Los Gatos, CA: Sky Oaks Productions, Inc.
Beck, I., and C. Juel. 1995. The role of decoding in learning to read. American Educator 19, no. 8.
Bradley, L., and P. E. Bryant. 1983. Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature 301:419-421.
1985. Rhyme and Reason in Reading and Spelling. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Carr, T., D. Davis, R. Durr, and T. Hagen. 1998. Improving Reading Readiness and Language Arts Skills through the Use of Phonemic Awareness. Chicago: St. Xavier University.
Christian, K., F. J. Morrison, and F. B. Bryant. 1998. Predicting kindergarten academic skills: Interactions among child care, maternal education, and family literacy environments. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 13, no. 3 (1998): 501-521.
Cunningham, A. E. 1990. Explicit versus implicit instruction in phonemic awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 50:429-444.
DeBruin-Parecki, A., K. Perkinson, and L. Ferderer. 2000. Helping Your Child Become a Reader. Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
Fielding-Barnsley, R. 1997. Explicit instruction in decoding benefits children high in phonemic awareness and alphabet knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading 1, no. 1:85-98.
Fox, B., and D. K. Routh. 1975. Analyzing spoken language into words, syllables, and phonemes: A developmental study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 4:331- 342.
1984. Phonemic analysis and synthesis as word attack skills: Revisited. Journal of Educational Psychology 76, no. 6:1059- 1064.
Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center. 1999. Early Learning, Later Success: The Abecedarian Study. http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~abc/.
Gardner H. 1983. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books. Grossen, B. 1997. A Synthesis of research on reading from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. The National Right to Read Foundation. www.nrrf.org.
Hannemann, R. E. 1997. Press statement at the Meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Chicago, IL.
International Reading Association. 2002. Family-School Partnerships: Essential Elements of Literacy Instruction in the United States. Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
Jensen, E. 2005. Teaching with the Brain in Mind. 2nd ed. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Juel, C. 1996A. Phonemic awareness: What is it? The Leadership Letters: Issues and Trends in Reading and Language Arts. Needham, MA: Silver Burdett and Ginn.
Juel, C., P. L. Griffith, and P. B. Gough. 1986. Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology 78, 4:243-255.
Kameenui, E. J. Winter 1996. Shakespeare and beginning reading: The readiness is all. Teaching Exceptional Children 27, no. 2.
Liberman, A. M. 1982. On finding that speech is special. American Psychologist 37, no. 2:148-167. Repr., Handbook of Cognitive Neuroscience, ed. Michael S. Gazzaniga. New York: Plenum Press, 1984.
Lomax, R. G., and L. M. McGee. 1987. Young children’s concepts about print and Reading: Toward a model of word reading acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly 22:237-256.
Lu, N. 2006. Your Child’s First Teacher. www.brainy-child.com.
Lundberg, I. 1987. Are letters necessary for the development of phonemic awareness? Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive 7, no. 5:472-475.
Lundberg, I., A. Olofsson, and S. Wall. 1980. Reading and spelling skills in the first school years predicted from phonemic awareness skills in kindergarten. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 21:159-173.
Maclean, M., P. Bryant, and L. Bradley. 1987. Rhymes, nursery rhymes, and reading in early childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 33:255-282.
Mann, V. A., P. Tobin, and R. Wilson. 1987. Measuring phonological awareness through the invented spellings of kindergarten children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 33:365-391.
May, F. B. 1990. Reading as Communication. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Co.
Morrow, L. M., ed. 1995. Family Literacy Connections in Schools and Communities. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. nces.ed.gov/pubs96/web/96814.asp.
Nathan, R. G., and K. E. Stanovich. 1991. The causes and consequences of differences in reading fluency. Theory Into Practice 30 (Summer 1991): 176- 184.
National Association for the Education of Young Children/International Reading Association. 1998. Learning to read and write: Developmentally appropriate practices for young children. Young Children 53, no. 4 (July 1998): 30-46.
National Commission on Reading. 1985. A pediatric early literacy program. The Program Manual for Reach Out and Read. National Commission on Reading.
National Governor’s Association Task Force on School Readiness. 2006. The Final report of the NGA Task Force on School Readiness and The Governor’s Guide to School Readiness. www.nga.org.
National Institute for Literacy. 2006. Put Reading First: Helping Your Child Learn to Read; A Parent Guide. www.nifl.gov.
Olofsson, A., and I. Lundberg. 1985. Evaluation of long term effects of phonemic Awareness training in kindergarten: Illustrations of some methodological Problems in evaluation research. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 26:21-34.
Partnership for Reading. 2000. Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching Children to Read; An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Share, D. L., A. F. Jorm, R. Maclean, and R. Matthews. 1984. Sources of individual differences in reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology 76, no. 6:1309-1324.
Shefelbine, J. 1995. Learning and Using Phonics in Beginning Reading. New York: Scholastic, Inc. Snow, C. E., S. M. Burns, and P. Griffin, eds. 1998. Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Snow, C. 1998. Interview with “Online NewsHour,” PBS. March 19.
Stanovich, K. E. 1988. Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the gardenvariety poor reader: The phonological-core variable difference modes. Journal of Learning Disabilities 21:590-612.
Stanovich, K. E., A. E. Cunningham, and B. B. Cramer, B.B. 1984. Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 38, no. 2:175-190.
Torneus, M. 1984. Phonological awareness and reading: A chicken and egg problem? Journal of Educational Psychology 76, no. 6: 1346-1358.
Treiman, R., and J. Baron. 1983. Phonemic-analysis training helps children benefit from spelling-sound rules. Memory and Cognition 11, no. 4:382-389.
Tunmer, W. E., and A. R. Nesdale. 1985. Phonemic segmentation skill and beginning reading. Journal of Educational Society 77:417-527.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Intergovernmental and Interagency Affairs, Educational Partnerships and Family Involvement Unit. 2003. Reading Tips for Parents. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Vellutino, F. R., and D. M. Scanlon. 1987. Phonological coding, phonological awareness and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 33:321-363.
Wagner, R. K., and J. K. Torgeson. 1987. The nature of phonological awareness and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin 101:192-212.
Williams, J. 1984. Phonemic analysis and how it relates to reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities 17:240-245.
1 For example, see DeBruin-Parecki 2000; Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center 1999.
2 DeBruin-Parecki 2000.
3 National Governor, Association Task Force 2006.
4 Partnership for Reading 2006.
5 Beck and Juel 1995, 106.
6 Beck and Juel 1995, 105.
7 Lu 2006.
8 Anderson, Hiebert, Scott, and Wilkinson 1985, 177; Christian, Morrison, and Bryant 1998.
9 Morrow 1995.
10 U.S. Department of Education 2003.
11 Hannemann 1997.
12 National Association for the Education of Young Children/International Reading Association 1998; National Commission on Reading 1985.
13 Kameenui 1996; Shefelbine 1995, 9; Juel 1996, 2; Armbruster, Lehr, and Osborn 2000; Partnership for Reading 2000.
14 Fielding-Barnsley 1997, 86.
15 Bradley and Bryant 1983, 1985; Fox and Routh 1975; Juel, Griffith, and Gough 1986; Liberman 1982; Lomax and McGee 1987; Lundberg, Olofsson, and Wall 1980; Maclean, Bryant, and Bradley 1987; Mann, Tobin, and Wilson 1987; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 2000; Share, Jorm, Maclean, and Matthews 1984; Stanovich 1988; Stanovich, Cunningham, and Cramer 1984; Tunmer and Nesdale 1985; Vellutino and Scanlon 1987; Wagner and Torgesen 1987; Williams 1984; Snow, Burns, and Griffin 1998.
16 Bradley and Bryant 1985; Cunningham 1990; Fox and Routh 1984; Lundberg 1987; Olofsson and Lundberg 1985; Torneus 1984; Treiman and Baron 1983; Vellutino and Scanlon, 1987.
17 Partnership for Reading 2000; Armbruster, Lehr, and Osborn 2003.
18 International Reading Association 2002, 4.
19 Beck and Juel 1995, 114.
20 Carr, Davis, Durr, and Hagen 1998; National Association for the Education of Young Children/International Reading Association 1998.
21 Fielding-Barnsley 1997, 85; Snow 1998.
22 Jensen 2005.
23 Grossen 1997.
24 Nathan and Stanovich 1991, 178.
25 May 1990.
© 2006, 2007, 2009 Sandviks HOP, Inc. Danbury, CT 06811 All rights reserved.